On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:29:17 +0530, Rakesh wrote: > [..] > >> > >> I request FISco member attention here. The non-responsive maintainer > >> policy was initiated long ago here. > > > > It might be that the Wiki explains how to contact FESCo. > > > > Well this thread already is part of process. > > > Meanwhile it would be nice if you reverted the changes in cvs. > > Some of them are confusing, such as the GPL+ -> GPLv2 change, > > which is not explained in the spec/changelog, or the duplicate > > directory inclusion. > > > > * Sun Jan 11 2009 Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.8.1-1 > - Updated to 0.8.1, fixed .desktop file and license tag. > - Fixed Unowned directories. > > It is mentioned. I don't see a point in reverting, but feel free to > revert if you think it is worth. I won't touch spec files which are overwritten randomly. The changelog entry is poor, because it's incomplete. It says "fixed license tag" without giving a rationale. It doesn't explain what was wrong about the previous license tag. And it doesn't mention what the tag was changed to. You simply discarded (= overwrote) the old comment that explained the previous license tag. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses the previous tag was correct. > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ The %dir entry is superfluous. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
