Re: F10/11 and Intel Integrated Graphics?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:27 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 21:54 +0000, Mike wrote:
> > Tomasz Torcz <tomek <at> pipebreaker.pl> writes:
> > 
> > >  Do you mean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464866
> > 
> > or
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473427
> > or
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429500
> > or
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473427
> > 
> > and a slew of others so yes it seems to cover a range of 
> > Intel Integrated graphics.
> 
> While we're complaining, Intel 830M has been broken since F9:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441665

As a workaround, try adding a minimal xorg.conf with:

Option "EXANoComposite" "true"

I just ran into this updating a Dell Latitude C400 (i830) to F10, and
I'm interesting in fixing it.

Dan

> 
> And for that matter, F10 broke on my Radeon 9600XT too:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474977
> 
> Blech. Is there something more I can do to help fix this? I have some C
> skills.
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux