On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > If it's on your people.redhat.com account, could you post a link? The > index.html you have up doesn't have a link to this package. It's found by going to the second link in my sig, the one about Infiniband specific rpms. Under there, the rhel5.3 rpms are present, and you can find the openmpi src rpm at this location: http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband/rhel5.3/src/ Ignore the bits in the spec file that deal with cleaning up all the previous, busted usage of alternatives. Or not if you want to see just how much of a mess it made :-/ > So, with the exception of the arch-specific files in %{_datadir} which > has changed for the new release, this seems to be FHS-kosher to me. If > you can get me a link to the new package I can take a look and see if > the situation there is worse. Well, not really (unless the FHS changed since I last read it). The solution was to create an %{mpidir} macro that was %{name}/%{version}-%{opt_cc} and use %{_libdir}/%{mpidir} as a prefix for the entire install. So, libraries, binaries, man pages, etc config files, they all reside under %{_lidbir}/%{mpidir}. That's an acceptable layout for things in /opt according to the FHS, but not for distribution provided files in %{_libdir}, and distribution provided files are prohibited from being placed in /opt. Hence the conundrum. -- Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford Infiniband specific RPMs available at http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
