Re: debuginfo audit: missing DWARF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:50 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:31 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:41 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > > The one file mentioned in the gtk2 package is a fake elf file that gets
> > > put into an otherwise empty directory to work around deficiencies in
> > > rpms directory handling, so thats not a concern.
> > 
> > Are those current deficiencies with the current rpm?  What is the
> > problem exactly?
> 
> >From the spec:
> 
> # create a dummy binary for /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules to work around
> # problems in our ia64 multilib infrastructure
> # See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253726 for more
> details
> echo 'int main (void) { return 0; }' > relocation-tag.c
> gcc -Os relocation-tag.c -o relocation-tag
> 
> 
> So not very relevant for Fedora.
> Lets just hope that ia64 multilib dies a well-deserved death,
> sometime...

ia64 multilib is dead, it's dead in upstream and our rpm, so this can go
away.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux