Axel Thimm wrote: > I don't want to rehash the discussion there, but I'm under the > impression that you don't know the history of it Oh I do. That doesn't mean it wasn't a mistake. ;-) Nor that it's a good idea to continue on that path. > and that you think this is just for personal pride or whatever. ... yet ... > FWIW rpmfusion is a 3rd party repo, very much like Dag, Dries, > PlanetCCRMA, CentOS Extras, KB, ATrpms etc. I'm not placing any > authority hierarchy upon any of these, and I'm expecting similar from > the other repo maintainers, of course. Sense the contradiction there? You're expecting the RPM Fusion community which includes dozens of packagers to treat your 2-person repository as an equal and you claim it's not personal pride? See, I maintain a small repository myself (http://repo.calcforge.org/fedora/ - mainly because those packages haven't been cleaned up for review in Fedora or RPM Fusion yet), but I would never expect that repository to be equivalent in importance to RPM Fusion. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
