Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I thought Michael Schwendt pointed out times when plugin .la's would > cause issues as well. Is this chain of reasoning correct: Plugin .la > encodes need for library foo's .la. foo .la is packaged in the -devel > subpackage. Plugins now drag in the -devel package and its dep chain. Could be, but afaik missing .la items haven't caused runtime problems afaik (as long as symbols are otherwise resolvable), but that would change when/if rpm's automatic .la file dependencies were ever used. So, yeah, still a good general idea (per guidelines) to avoid the hassle whenever possible. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
