2009/1/4 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/1/4 Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Another aside: Other the past few months I've noticed that many >> packages don't create a separate emacs-foo subpackage but rather use a >> trick with %triggerin to drop elisp files into place when emacs is >> installed. I also think this should be discussed and documented in the >> packaging guidelines as an alternative when a package only has 1 or 2 >> elisp files. > > Couldn't this be a general mechanism to be used also for vim > syntaxfiles, shell completion rules, etc, etc... ? yup... there's already examples of this. What I'm not too clear on is whether triggers are really a good idea. I have vague memories that the use of triggers was discouraged in fedora, but I don't recall why - perhaps because using triggers makes things a bit less deterministic. Perhaps I missremember. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
