Le samedi 03 janvier 2009 à 11:45 -0600, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 18:35:52 +0100, > Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 18:33 -0600, Bruno Wolff III a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 15:37:47 -0700, > > > > > > It appears that glibc in Rawhide (2.8.90) is older than the glibc in > > > > the initial F10 release (2.9). Am I seeing that correctly? If so, > > > > should I downgrade, or wait for Rawhide to catch up? > > > > > > There are a few other things that have higher versions in F10. That caused > > > me a bit of grief. The dejavu fonts change also caused some problems. > > > > Could you please expand? The update path is supposed to work, and I > > notified every single packager that needed to change its deps when the > > packages were re-organised. > > Well it doesn't. Updates have been pushed for a few packages in F10 updates > and/or updates testing that have high NVRs than the corresponding rawhide > NVRs. Well, I should have been clearer: which dejavu fonts problems did you encounter? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
