2009/1/2 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:33:43PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:09:56 -0500, Paul wrote: >> >> > I'd like to arrange for some sort of reward for the top 10 reviewers. >> > We could turn that into an annual event. >> >> What are your plans on avoiding "quantity instead of quality" effects? > > How does the packaging community currently ensure that packages > reviewed are of sufficient quality? > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug My thoughts on this is that as we progress further down the food chain the reviews are more likely to be in a quantity vs quality battle. In fact with these stats when someone all of a sudden jumps up they might then get a few looks at there reviews. Another thought would be to each month or two have the sponsor verify at least one of the bugs of each of there minions. As a packager myself I would actually appreciate this, keeps everyone in the loop on little changes by packaging committee. --Brennan Ashton -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
