Am Sonntag, den 21.12.2008, 12:30 -0600 schrieb Eric Sandeen: > eCryptfs is still somewhat fragile at times; under constrained usecases > it's reasonably ok but if you stray from that things can go badly... > The stuff Ubuntu has done is interesting but I'm wondering if anyone > there has really given the kernelspace side a good workout. (I've > worked on eCryptfs a lot, and it's pretty nifty, but there are still > some kinks to work out). Yes, filenames are not encrypted. Maybe this matters, maybe not. customer-name-finances.odt might be quite a private filename.. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
