(Raw e-mail addresses removed, PLEASE don't add your own when replying;
I get enough spam already.)
drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 23 décembre 2008 15:05, Mat Booth a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 10:55 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11
------------------------
* Mon Dec 22 17:00:00 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject
dot org>
- 1.13-1
⟃ Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff
❤ use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place
Two new symbols! L33t.
The first one does not display for me. :-( All I see is a square
with 27c3 inside.
Am I missing a font or something? I'm using the latest Firefox 3 in
F10.
It's a math symbol so you're probably missing one of the optional
distro math fonts.
Sorry but this starts to become annoying using weird symbols in the
spec file has no added value.
Starting? It's been annoying for some time now, and adds no value. If it
was consistently the utf-8 bullet, well, maybe. As is, I'm sorry, but I
have to agree with Richard Hughes classification of this behavior¹.
1: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/101291
Why can't you just write a readable spec file like all other maintainers do?
Using some non default fonts makes it even worse.
Even when the fonts are displayed this makes the specfile "harder" to
read than using simple "-".
+1.
--
Matthew
このテキストを翻訳する時間の無駄だばかばかしい
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
