On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:34:02PM -0500, Deji Akingunola wrote: ... >> >> I can take over looking after grads, I use it often. What are these >> functionalities that you claimed were removed? I've not noticed any >> yet. > > lat is not in. The removed files are: > fgbds.c > fgutil.c > gagui.c > gaimg.c > gaimg.h > gsgui.c > gstmp.c > lats.c > latsgrib.c > lats.h > latsint.c > latsint.h > latsnc.c > latsparm.h > latsstat.c > latstime.c > latstime.h > pcx11e.c > > But apart from lats, there is not much problematic left out. > Since the it (grads) is already packaged in Fedora without lats support, its removal shouldn't be an issue for us then. And actually some of the files above (gagui.c, gsgui.c, gstmp.c and pcx11e.c) are still present in grads-2.0.a3 > Do you want all the branches? > Yes > Also do you want libsx? It is a dependency though it isn't currently I can be a co-maintainer for it. Deji > used because of at the time I packaged grads gagui.c was not under an > acceptable license, but now it is, at least upstream. > > -- > Pat > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
