Hi, Since there has been no more remarks on the clarified font package naming rules discussed as part of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_Fedora_11_packaging_changes_(2008-11-08) I've queued the following for approval FPC-side: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) Except for the comps changes which seem not baked yet, that concludes the fonts-related guidelines changes and clarifications that were proposed for F11. Sincerely, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
