On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:28:38PM +0100, Thomas Moschny wrote: > > I also didn't find the rules fuzzy, but - they read: > > == snip == > > You must use one of the following formats: > > * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.6-4 > - And fix the link syntax. > > * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.6-4 > - And fix the link syntax. > > * Fri Jun 23 2006 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> > - 0.6-4 > - And fix the link syntax. > > == snip == > > And while these three variants only differ in the way the > version-release is specified, I can't see how from that follows that > the rest is free form? Maybe I'm missing something, but all three > clearly use simple dashes for each stanza of the changelog entry. If I recall well, the FPC ruling was not about anything else than the version release format. I didn't found any trace of that, though. That being said it is indeed unclear from the guideline that only the date and version-release is specified here. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list