Re: Amarok 2 on F9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2008/12/19 Dr. Diesel <dr.diesel@xxxxxxxxx>


On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2008/12/19 Bob Arendt <rda@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Oscar<Soker> wrote:
>>
>> Plz don't do that, Amarok 2 is not as goog as Amarok 1.4 it loose a lot of
>> functionality
>>
> +1
> Amarok 2 is missing some this 1.4 has:
>  doesn't have UMS media player support.  Bug 473807
>  doesn't ship documentation. Bug 473522
> *Please* do not "upgrade" f9 to Amarok2

We don't vote on mailing lists.  If you would like to use a particular
package version though, we do have alternatives:
 

Have you been sleeping the past few days?  How about the call/vote from the Fedora group on Nautilus?

And that thread is a prime example of _why_ we don't vote on mailing lists.

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't...
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux