On Friday 19 December 2008 05:41:20 am Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius schrieb:
> > On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:30 +0100, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> >> I've run a x86_64 mass rebuild of all our Fedora packages and found
> >> several noarch packages which erronously use {_libdir} or {_lib} in
> >> their spec files. rpmdiff shows this output:
> >>
> >> ./firstaidkit-0.2.2-5.fc11.noarch.rpm
> >> removed /usr/lib/firstaidkit
> >> removed /usr/lib/firstaidkit/plugins
> >> added /usr/lib64/firstaidkit
> >> added /usr/lib64/firstaidkit/plugins
> >>
> >> As noarch packages can be built on any machine/architecture in koji,
> >> we'd end up with lib64 directories on 32bit archs
> >>
> >> Here is the list of offending packages I've found:
> >>
> >>
> >> Package Owner
> >> ------------------------
> >> ntfs-config laxathom
> >> firstaidkit msivak
> >> terminus-font ndim
> >> gdeskcal pfj
> >> libopensync-plugin-synce awjb
> >> cohoba tjikkun
> >> gnome-schedule farnold
> >> common-lisp-controller green
> >> gcstar tian
> >> revisor-cli jsteffan
> >> jruby konradm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Can we make it a policy to not use _libdir or _lib in noarch packages,
> >> please ?
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch
> > package requirements?
> >
> > Ralf
>
> I don't have any preferences on how we solve it, I'll leave that for FPC to
> decide. But I think it needs to be solved or we'll run out of luck and
> build one of those packages on 64bit anytime soon.
>
> Karsten
Note that the version of jruby in CVS *isn't* tagged or built... it's in
progress of being bumped to 1.1.6, I've just been waiting on some new
dependencies for a *long* time.
Regards,
--
Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
