Trever L. Adams wrote: > Conrad Meyer wrote: >> On Saturday 29 November 2008 07:42:50 am Trever L. Adams wrote: >> >>> Additionally, I have several packages I am thinking of doing (some of >>> which I have spec files for already). However, I am displeased with a >>> few of them that come from one tarball. There are several options >>> (crm114, dspam, or mailing back-ends for example) for dovecot-antispam. >>> The problem is, you cannot build one module for dovecot that does them >>> all, so the module has to be rebuilt with slightly different options and >>> must conflict with all other dovecot-antispam RPMs. Is possible from one >>> spec file and tarball? This would require different setup, build, >>> install and package setups. This is because the same module would be >>> built for each area, need to be packaged, and then move onto the rest. >>> >> >> Are you suggesting that in order for multiple things to Provide: >> dovecot-antispam they need to come from the same SRPM? >> >> Regards, >> > Sorry for not responding quickly. This email disappeared. The problem I > have is that dovecot-antispam has to be built specifically for each of > the three or four ways it works. (Being: crm114, dspam, mail forward and > some signature thing.) > > Instead of having four SRPMs which are identical other than just a few > configuration lines and SPEC file changes, is it possible to build all > four from one SRPM or at least from one tarball? > Yes. I believe the vim package does this to generate the vim-minimal (with /bin/vi) and vim-enhanced (with /usr/bin/vim). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
