Sometimes, it is necessary to perform a mass rename to bring some consistency to a class of packages. In that case any workflow that proceeds package by package is the road to failure, since — either each package is done separately by different people with little coordination (and you don't get consistency, some packagers will always slack or fail) – or one person goes through each package and you get burnout and again, failure (and I won't even speak of doing a new review for each package) I'd like to see a mode where: — a list of consistent renames is approved collectively — the associated cvs work is done in one shot by infra — each individual packager gets to work on the spec changes of his packages — an experienced packager or a group of packagers is mandated to check it's done correctly and eventually to substitute to the packagers who don't do their bit at all -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
