Re: performance test by Phoronix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: performance test by Phoronix
From: "Muayyad AlSadi" <alsadi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:51:27 +0200
In-reply-to: <1229596333.3612.78.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hmmmmmmmm, faster processing slower IO......
what to consider
1. SELinux
2. some ext3 fs mount options
3. having some daemon
...etc.

BTW: I'm pleased by fedora performance,
I don't care about benchmarks

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance test by Phoronix
  - From: Michal Schmidt

References:
- performance test by Phoronix
  - From: Dan Horák

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 10 - Boot Analysis
Next by Date: Re: wxGTK2 -> wxGTK rename without Provides
Previous by thread: performance test by Phoronix
Next by thread: Re: performance test by Phoronix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux