Re: What I'm going to do: Was: RFC: Description text in packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > This is a spec file description or an update description in bohdi.
> > 
> > The following things ‘were’ fixed:
> > • Fix ‘dave’
> > • Fubar update because of “security”
> > ---------------------------------------------
> 
> Dumb question. All the complaints I've seen that come in are
> about word-wrapping, but your main example is about character
> escaping/transliteration. Why not just do the word-wrapping, and
> leave it at that? (Note that PK at the moment wordwraps badly,
> which causes other issues.)

Alternatively, if we remove the requirement on the spec data
itself to be manually wrapped with newlines, this could (theoretically)
sort itself out fairly well.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux