On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:58:26AM +0100, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Maybe you missed the first wave of orphanage, some days ago I orphaned, > > among others, tetex-tex4ht. Do you also want to maintain it? It is a > > package that needs some work, upstream is quite active, and ensuring > > that it builds from the literate sources can require some work. > > Yes, I'll also take that one (all branches). And in response to > Jonathan Underwood's question: I'm happy to co-maintain all of these > packages. Branch realeased, thanks for taking tex4ht, I think that it is an important package for fedora. The name should be tex-tex4ht (or could even be tex4ht), but since the process to change the name was a rereview it seemed to be a loss of time for me. But since this package is new for you, maybe you'll want to do that. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
