Jesse Keating wrote:
Here is another example where maintainers need to coordinate more and pay attention. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-10000 (rpcbind-0.1.7-1.fc9) went into Fedora 9 updates testing on 11-22. On the 25th bodhi feedback showed that this requires selinux changes. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11122 (selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9) went into Fedora 9 updates testing on 12-10. This was the build to fix rpcbind. On 12-10 rpcbind was submitted for stable. On the same day, bodhi feedback requested that this update not go out until the matching selinux-policy went out to stable. On 12-11 rpcbind went into stable.
Yeah, this is what prompted my earlier post. This also makes me wonder why I bother running updates-testing on some of my machines. Seems like half the time I report an issue, the update gets pushed to stable anyways.
-- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
