On Monday 15 December 2008 10:18:11 am Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 15 décembre 2008 à 08:41 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > Currently, I'm opposed to having a Guideline that mandates UTF-8 over > > ASCII. > > And I'm opposed to continuing to abuse ASCII glyphs and pretend they > stand for something other than their creators intended. One couldn't > avoid it when the available encoding didn't provide a clean way to write > some stuff, but doing it in 2008 is plain dumb. Granted, UTF-8 glyphs can be abused as well; see %changelog in the following: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/perl-Convert-UUlib/devel/perl-Convert-UUlib.spec?revision=1.21&view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lzop/devel/lzop.spec?revision=1.14&view=markup You even used two different glyphs for "fixed the license"! Regards, -- Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
