Michael Schwendt pisze: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:39:53 +0100, Julian wrote: > >> This is some fallout from the new RPM pkgconfig automatic deps, right? > > No. > > There is some misunderstanding with regard to those automatic deps. > > 1.) Automatic Provides pkgconfig(foo) are in the packages for a longer > time already. Just examine old builds to see. If any Provides is missing > nevertheless, a rebuild may fix it, though. > > 2.) Only builds with a sufficiently recent RPM add the automatic > RPM _Requires_ (!) for any pkgconfig Requires found in a .pc file in > a package. For most packages, the maintainers has added Requires for > all needed -devel packages before, however. > > 3.) Rebuilding existing packages in Rawhide only breaks something, > if a Requires pkgconfig(foo) is added automatically without any > package being the provider. > > Case 3) does not apply to your package. Its dependencies resolve fine > in mock/yum. The build fails at compile-time, because dbus-devel > is missing. gconf2-devel should have added "Requires: dbus-devel" > much earlier or now be rebuilt to add the automatic Requires for > an automatic pkgconfig(dbus-1) dependency. > >> Package 'dbus-1', required by 'gconf', not found > >> Package dbus-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path. >> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `dbus-1.pc' >> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > OK, GConf2-devel indeed does not have dbus-devel Requires defined, but then how come the build did work on F-10? Also, previous version built fine on F-11. Regards, Julian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
