Re: Fedora QA ? - Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13.12.2008 15:33, Robert Scheck wrote:
>
The reporting should be always possible, as it maybe turns later out if an
update was broken or not. And how a about yum? If it's PackageKit-only it
is not really an advantage, given that unexperienced users won't rate such
updates anyway usually (at least from my point of view).

BTW, was "automatic feedback from the clients to bodhi" discussed already somewhere in this thread? E.g. if the package maintainer could see in bodhi "2500 users installed and ran this testin-update for at least three days, no negative karma reported, no new bugs" then it should be quite save to move the package.

Cu
knurd

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux