Re: yum --skip-broken update by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> JK> Which I do believe is against the packaging guidelines.
>
> Not really.  Conflicts should be explicit if they exist.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts
>
> "Whenever possible, Fedora packages should avoid conflicting with each
> other. Unfortunately, this is not always possible. These guidelines
> illustrate how conflicts should be handled in Fedora, specifically
> concerning when and when not to use the Conflicts: field."

More importantly, in the next paragraph:

"As a general rule, Fedora packages must NOT contain any usage of the
Conflicts: field."

jerry

-- 
Store in cool, dry place. Rotate stock.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux