On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Its not really a problem to simply add --skip-broken when something is broke. But I'd be OK with yum automatically using the --skip-broken feature, explaining what is broke at the end, then asking if it is ok to report it anonymously.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I would hope that this would be opt-in as well, or we're going to make a
Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
>> Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>>>> 1) People who have dependency problem won't see them anymore.
>>>
>>> b/c we need to get the dep problems reported, too.
>>
>> Then you also enable by default the
>> yum-email-dep-problems-to-fedora-devel
>> plugin.
>
> Do we have an anonymous bug filer account we can use? If so, then,
> well,yes, we can do that.
>
> -sv
>
lot of people angry. Some people don't necessarily want to broadcast the
list of packages they have or want on their system - broken or not.
Its not really a problem to simply add --skip-broken when something is broke. But I'd be OK with yum automatically using the --skip-broken feature, explaining what is broke at the end, then asking if it is ok to report it anonymously.
--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
