On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen Warren wrote: > >> Arthur Pemberton wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Stephen Warren >>>> >>>> That's an argument for not having introduced the alpha/beta-quality >>>> release KDE 4.0 into Fedora in the first place. >>> >>> And that's an arguement for turning Fedora into something useless. >> >> What, usable software is useless? You can't possibly argue that KDE 4.0 >> was a good choice given the need to replace it with 4.1 so quickly. > > Useless in the light of the fact that there are dozens of other conservative > distributions; the whole point of Fedora is to be fast-moving. This is exactly my point. A slow-moving Fedora makes it "just another distro". -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
