>>>>> "CM" == Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: CM> Is there any reason not to provide it as part of GCC given that it CM> simply extends the functionality of GCC (adds another language CM> frontend)? I imagine this won't happen for the same reason that GPC won't be included as part of the Fedora GCC packages: it's a separate project, with its own release schedule. Until the sources actually get into the main GCC tree, it would be quite difficult to keep them together. That will almost certainly never happen with GPC; I don't know if UPC would have better luck. That said, I did a lot of work to get GPC to build and work in the face of a changing GCC version that it may occasionally coincide with (and thus needs to not conflict with). I guess one day I need to get back to it. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
