On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:33:02 -0900, Jeff wrote: > > jspaleta AT gmail.com > > python-basemap > > python-basemap-0.99-5.fc10.i386 requires libgeos-3.0.1.so > > Hmm geos-3.0.3 went out as an update and bumped the library and it > appears that it skipped testing and went straight to stable and was > not marked as security. Joy! > Let's see if I can get python-basemap rebuilt. > > Now before I go ballistic over the fact that this skipped testing and > isnt marked as security... was that just a mistake or was that > intended? It hopefully tells some people that often I'm equal to an early-warning system. And if I complain that updates ought to spend some time in updates-testing first [1], this is based on experience. More breakage in this report, earlier reports, and private reports based on other check scripts, was also caused by skipping updates-testing. One packager this time did not know about releng's buildroot overrides and didn't ask either. So, once again it is both a documentation and communication problem. -- [1] And I never suggested that it should not be possible to skip "testing" for special updates. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
