On Wed December 10 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote: > All this was so much simpler and more obvious before that useless security > team approval step was introduced (without really consulting packagers > outside of the security team). :-( What benefit does that approval step > bring us? It's obviously not QA or this update wouldn't have ended up in > stable! It is QA, but with a different focus. The security team checks whether the information within the update is correct, e.g. using the correct bug number for the CVE and whether the update contains a useful explaination. At least this is what I believe to have read and experienced with a security update. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list