Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed December 10 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> All this was so much simpler and more obvious before that useless security
> team approval step was introduced (without really consulting packagers
> outside of the security team). :-( What benefit does that approval step
> bring us? It's obviously not QA or this update wouldn't have ended up in
> stable!

It is QA, but with a different focus. The security team checks whether the 
information within the update is correct, e.g. using the correct bug number 
for the CVE and whether the update contains a useful explaination. At least 
this is what I believe to have read and experienced with a security update.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux