Re: nautilus depends on a lot of stuff via gvfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:46 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Fwiw, I don't think it is a big problem to change things so that gvfs
> > subpackages are pulled in by comps instead of by hard deps from
> > nautilus, as long as they are all in the default install. I don't
> > introducing a nautilus metapackage for this purpose is necessary or a
> > good idea.
> 
> In THE default install? Are you thinking about the traditional
> installer and the Desktop spin here?

I was thinking about comps. Spins override the comps defaults according
to their needs in the .ks anyway.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux