Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > > If there is none, it uses /bin/vi. In fact I have sone a bit of > > investigations and it uses, in pathnames.h _PATH_VI which is defined in > > /usr/invlude/paths.h. > > > > So it is a missing dependency, in my opinion. > > No it's not. People may want to use an actually usable editor and not have > their system polluted with this relict of history. Flamewar alert! [vi(1) is actually a /very/ usable editor. I believe some standard or other requires its presence; in fact, it is one of the things you can depend on finding on any Unixy system.] -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
