Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:25:30 -0500, James wrote:
>> This is essentially the -devel package with all the debugging turned
>> on. I guess I could name it ustr-debug-devel if we really have to
>> (although having a ustr-debug-devel without a ustr-debug seems a little
>> weird).
>
> How would that be weird? I can imagine things like a-devel package that
> specifies an interface without any main package to depend on.
In fact we already have such packages: template-only C++ libraries. As
templates need to be instantiated from their headers, they have all their
code inlined in headers and no actual libraries. See eigen-devel,
eigen2-devel, gmm-devel for some examples.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
