On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 09:54 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > Now, if anyone wants to discuss this any further, I am willing as long as we > drop all the hostility. I'm tired of it. Attacking the security target is not > something I want to debate as its out of my control. I just want to meet it. > > Hope you find this informtion useful. Unfortunately, attacking the security target is exactly what the Fedora community is going to do. We don't just meet things because it's a checkbox on a list. If changes are going to be made (or kept) in Fedora, they need to be for an understandable and agreeable reason. I have yet to see anything in your definition of CAPP that adds real security to our system. What I get out of it so far is "If all the admins play nice, we can track what they're doing". But if admins stop playing nice, all bets are off. What kind of security is that? What value does that add to Fedora systems? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
