James Antill wrote:
> We also have _much less_ resources dedicated to python than we do GCC.
> My guess is that if a second python is proposed for py3k, it'll get
> voted down again.
I think migrating without shipping parallel versions of Python at any point
is a completely unrealistic dream. Just look at how many packages still
depend on qt3 and kdelibs3, and how there are still packages depending on
gtk+-1.2 even when plans for GTK+ 3 are already ongoing. We have no reason
to believe Python will be any different.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
