On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:38 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Yes. This figures into our plans for migrating code within Fedora to > 3.x. However, it doesn't address Michael's concerns about maintaining > code on python <= 2.5. > > -Toshio > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list Short of a complete code audit, what would it take to identify what packages need what degree of modifications? For example, what if we ran 2to3 on a number of the "core" packages that we consider to be essential to a Fedora system, and see how much really needs to be done? This might be a nice reality check to see what the situation really is. I'm sure we'll find a lot of surprises, good & bad, if someone can commit to doing it... Maybe a great start would be on the packages that Ignacio et al (or is it just him?) have already converted over to 2.6 compatibility... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
