On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 17:40 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > Josh Boyer píše v St 03. 12. 2008 v 11:05 -0500: > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:53:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > On 03.12.2008 16:39, Brian Pepple wrote: > > >> On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 10:20 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > >>> /topic FESCo meeting -- Secondary Arches: will they ever fly? (aka, > > >>> wtf happened to Fedora ia64, and what can/should we do to resuscitate > > >>> it). > > >> Added to the schedule. > > > > > > Wouldn't it be better to first discuss this on the list first? > > > > Here's a brief summary as I know it: [snip] > > Maybe it's time we start a SIG. We have Sparc, ia64, ARM, and one > > or two potential others. The biggest hurdle is koji at the moment > > and hopefully that will be solved soon. Then we can figure out where > > to go from there. > > Work is being done on s390x too. Wasn't the idea that each arch should be its own SIG. And it'd be really nice to see semi-regular updates from the various arches that are doing things on progress, either in the form of blog posts, mails to fedora-devel, smoke signals, carrier pigeons :-) While I know they're not all dead, status could help show up common blocking problems and get more people involved in helping to resolve them Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
