2008/12/3 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Le Mer 3 décembre 2008 08:57, Nikolay Vladimirov a écrit : > >> The point of rawhide is to be broken :). > > No it isn't. The point of rawhide is to get different development > tracks in sync, in a non-broken state that can be QAed. > > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot > >Le Mer 3 décembre 2008 09:42, Nikolay Vladimirov a écrit : > You're right. This statement was intended to be humorous, reflecting > on the general case that there is always something not working as it > should(or as you expect it) . 2008/12/3 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >Such statements are dangerous because they lower tester expectations >(causing them not to report problems or not to test at all) and >confort packagers that dump broken packages in rawhide without >pre-testing and without allocating time to process problem reports >once testes complain. I disagree. Just sharing my experience with rawhide. -- NV -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
