Patrice Dumas пишет:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 02:42:25AM +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Patrice Dumas пишет:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 08:46:20PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
Great news. In this case really may be best solution add /etc/cron.d
into crontab package?
I don't think so, at least if cronie directly uses files in /etc/cron.d.
--
Pat
AFIAK cronie do not use files from it, cronie only provide service to
handle jobs from this directory. And fcron will do the same.
It is advertized in the crond man page, so I think it is directly done
by cronie, (and I don't know where it would be configured otherwise).
I can't find any mention of cron.d in man of crond.
$ rpm -q cronie
cronie-1.0-7.fc9.i386
Furthermore, as mentioned above, fcron will does the same in short time.
I thing in any way "Require crontabs" must be in both crons.
Not in the main package.
Not in main package? Is there any subpackage of crontab in Fedora??
$ repoquery 'crontab*'
crontabs-0:1.10-19.fc9.noarch
Or you suppose create new one?
User may want another crontab than the fedora
one.
Off course. What to obstruct the create another one to replace fedora
variant? Do not see any problem there.
Furthermore if /etc/cron.d will be included into both crons, do not make
this conflicts (if both must be installed on the same machine off
course)??
Dir ownership doesn't lead to conflict, on the contrary, it is a rather
natural way to present virtual provides (as long as it is in /etc).
--
Pat
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
