Panu Matilainen wrote: > Just a heads-up, I'm (finally) enabling the generation of automatic > pkg-config and libtool requires in rpm. Provides for these have been > generated since first rpm 4.6.0 alpha hit rawhide, so with a bit of > luck, all/most involved packages have been rebuilt since then and > already have the needed provides for satisfying the new requires. > > But if you see unsatisfied dependencies on pkgconfig(foo) and > libtool(foo), request a rebuild of the dependant package, that's all > it should take. Except if you happen to hit a big chain of > pkg-config using packages that haven't been rebuilt in several > months, or bugs in the dependency generation, or buggy pkg-config > .pc files... A recent build of gtkpod failed to install libgpod-devel¹, which requires pkgconfig(gobject-2.0). Shouldn't glib2-devel provide that? It's certainly been rebuilt recently, yet the only pkgconfig provides it has is pkgconfig(glib-2.0). The latest glib2-devel package has a number of .pc files though: $ rpm -qpl glib2-devel-2.19.1-2.fc11.i386.rpm | grep '\.pc$' /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gio-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gio-unix-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/glib-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-export-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gmodule-no-export-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gobject-2.0.pc /usr/lib/pkgconfig/gthread-2.0.pc So, is this a bug in the libgpod packaging or in the rpm pkgconfig provides stuff? ¹ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=966791&name=root.log -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Abstainer, n.: A weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Attachment:
pgpuTZaR2SZ1W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
