Re: First Report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-11-30 at 15:38 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > The first cycle of rebuilds is done, and here's the results.
> >
> > There were 7 packages that I didn't have permission to modify. I trust
> > that the maintainers will be gracious enough to modify and build them
> > for me:
> >
> > beecrypt
> > certmaster
> > duplicity
> > func
> > pexpect
> > rpm
> > xulrunner
> >   
> 
> We can probably see about Func & certmaster rebuilds next week.
> 
> I am unclear on what you would have to modify as it seems you just need 
> to rebuild all the packages.

The optimal case would be just a release bump. Just slightly more
difficult would be if the package hardcodes the egg-info path. Anything
else... may need more work. Especially if your Python code uses the new
reserved words in 2.6.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux