Re: Feature proposal: New, Standard Documentation System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 09:32:26AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> Debian forces all programs to come with a man page.  If one is
> missing, this is considered a bug and packagers have to write one.
> 
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html

I don't think that making a man page should be a guideline in fedora. If
th efedora contributor wants to work a man page with upstream, fine, but
it should be optional.

> This would be an excellent idea for Fedora to follow (and we can,
> license permitting, use the Debian man pages).

If there is a good debian man page and nothing upstream, I think it is
best practice for a packager to use the debian man page. But I don't
think that it needs a guideline, it is fairly obvious that it is right.

Maybe you could add something on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks
stating that it is good to work a man page with upstream like debian
does and reusing debian manpage is also worth it.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux