Le Mer 26 novembre 2008 13:18, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski a écrit : > > On Wednesday, 26 November 2008 at 12:56, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> You can do a lot of things, but my point is >> 1. most people won't bother and therefore >> 2. magic packages where the rpm -> srpm relation is not obvious are >> just introducing drag and problems in the Fedora workflows. > > That should not be an argument to force packagers to use convoluted > rpm names. Maybe it should be otherwise, but the current situation is the one I described, and out packaging must work with current tools, not hypothetical better tools which may appear next month or in ten years. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
