On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:57 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:50:24AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > Typically the VBT signature doesn't mean much. But yes, full log would > > be interesting. > > I tried with 32-bit: still no graphics. > > Attached: > - Xorg.0.log.vesa (no xorg.conf or xorg.conf specifying "vesa") and > - Xorg.0.log.intel (with xorg.conf specifying "intel"). Very strange. What kind of display is it? Are you using an SDVO card (pseudo-PCIE looking thing with a tiny chip on one side and a DVI or whatever connector on the other)? - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
