On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:54:43 +0100 opensource@xxxxxxxxx (Till Maas) wrote: > On Thu November 20 2008, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > orphan:BADSOURCE:gst-plugins-0.8.12.tar.bz2:gstreamer08-plugins > > orphan:BADSOURCE:kbiof-0.3.tar.gz:kbiof > > orphan:BADURL:gaim-galago-0.5.1.tar.bz2:purple-galago > > orphan:BADURL:gnome-blog-0.9.1.tar.bz2:gnome-blog > > orphan:BADURL:gnome-yum-0.1.4.tar.gz:gnome-yum > > orphan:BADURL:kbackup-0.5.4.tar.bz2:kbackup > > orphan:BADURL:moomps-5.8.tar.bz2:moomps > > orphan:BADURL:new-1.3.9.tar.gz:new > > orphan:BADURL:pam-script-0.1.7.tar.gz:pam_script > > orphan:BADURL:pam_usb-0.4.0.tar.gz:pam_usb > > orphan:BADURL:pekwm-0.1.5.tar.bz2:pekwm > > orphan:BADURL:TPG-3.1.2.tar.gz:python-tpg > > orphan:BADURL:tvn24_0.2.8-1.tar.gz:gnome-applet-tvn24 > > Are these maybe orphaned? Yes. :) However, they have not been marked 'dead.package'. So, either the maintainer who orphaned them didn't do that, or the expectation was that someone would pick them up soon. > > till:BADURL:aircrack-ng-1.0-20081109.tar.gz:aircrack-ng > > This is a svn snapshot, therefore there is no URL available. Is there > some way to indicate this to your script? Another SourceX of this > package is aircrack-ng-tarball which is a script that can be used to > generate the snapshot. I spotted some more packages in the list that > contain a date in their tarball and therefore are probably snapshot > releases. if it's a snapshot, why does it have a URL? It currently is: Source0: http://download.aircrack-ng.org/aircrack-ng-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz But it should just be: Source0: aircrack-ng-%{version}-%{alphatag}.tar.gz And have a commented section above describing how it was generated. > Regards, > Till kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
