Re: RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le dimanche 23 novembre 2008 à 12:21 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :

> The consensus doesn't seem to be entirely clear

Meaning there are none

>  but I added the check anyway 

Please do not add checks to rpmlint which have not been reviewed by FPC.
Packagers are taking rpmlint output as authoritative and I don't see why
we should bother with FPC at all if you're taking policy in your hands.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux