On 21.11.2008 16:43, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 14:33 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
The packaging guidelines have a single sentence on package
summaries:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description
"The summary should be a short and concise description of the
package"
Sorry to keep going on about this, but this is the contents of the
email I'm about to send to ~50 package maintainers.
To all those that got that mail: if you want to know which of you
packages have problems check the headers of the mails you got. You'll
find something like this:
[...] Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id
3so259690qwe.47 for <rss2email-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 22 Nov
2008 07:43:09 -0800 (PST)
[...]
E.g. in this case it was rss2email that needs work.
@Richard, do you really expect that those people with more than (say) 5
packages check all those 419 lines in the files you attached to look
which of their packages need to be changed (reminder: some people own
even more than 200 packages iirc)?
Cu
knurd
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
