On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nah, it's nonsense to even try listing the supported video formats > in the summary if you can list them in the longer and detailed > description. What about MVCD,XVCD,XSVCD,RSVCD,TVCD,TSVCD and others? > The short summary simply cannot answer a lot of questions the user > might have. yes... this level of detail is part of the ingredient and side effects listing on the side of the medicine bottle. You know what would be interesting. What if each character in the summary had a real cost associated with it... but the description did not... and it was in the packagers and users benefit to use the space sparingly. What if for example the UI deliberately tried to put packages with the shortest Summary first in a search listing. Would that put enough value on a concise summary without stripping it of essential meaning or value as a text string? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
