Till Maas wrote: > > Also all the differen summaries for media players above do not really provide > much information that allows to distinguish them, e.g. is the gstreamer based > media player or the player from Mozilla not feature rich or customizable? I > don't know, but the summary does not really help here. > I agree with your other points. This one is tough, though. If all of the media players are customizable and feature rich then what sets yours apart? That it comes from a recognizable brand name (Mozilla). That the goal of the project upstream is to be "customizable". You can't encode a complete user-experience in the Summary but you can try to encode enough that someone will read the description to find out more. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
